토익스피킹 파트5. 주 4일 근무제 의견제시 질문 및 모범답안 학습 가이드 [P5-0009]

TOShigh 2025. 1. 7. 12:20

유럽 일부 국가에서 이미 도입 주 4일 근무제의 국내 도입이 이슈가 된적이 있는데요. 멀지않은 미래에 우리가 직면하게될 근무환경의 변화를 주제로 토익스피킹 파트5. 의견제문제를 준비해봤어요.

주 4일제 근무 의견제시 질문

If your company were planning to implement a four-day workweek to improve work-life balance, would you support that plan? Why or why not? Give reasons or examples to support your opinion.

원어민 모범답안 1.

I would support the plan for a four-day workweek. A four-day workweek allows employees to have more personal time, which can reduce burnout and improve mental health. Having an extra day off encourages a better work-life balance, making employees more productive and engaged during the days they work. It also helps reduce absenteeism, as employees feel more rested and motivated. The company could still maintain high productivity by encouraging more focused work during the shortened week. Companies in countries like Iceland that have adopted a four-day workweek reported higher productivity and employee satisfaction. A four-day workweek promotes well-being and productivity, making it a beneficial policy.

답변 분석: 핵심 포인트와 구조

1. 핵심 주장:

4일 근무제는 직원의 워라밸과 생산성을 향상시키는 데 매우 효과적인 정책이다.

2. 근거와 논리:

개인 시간 증가: 추가 휴무일은 번아웃을 줄이고 정신 건강을 개선한다.
워라밸 향상: 업무와 개인 생활의 균형이 개선되어 직원들이 더 몰입하고 생산적으로 일할 수 있다.
결근율 감소: 충분히 휴식한 직원은 결근율이 낮아지고 동기가 높아진다.
성공 사례: 아이슬란드의 사례에서 4일 근무제가 생산성과 직원 만족도를 높인 것으로 나타났다.

고득점을 위한 답변 구성 가이드

1. 입장 명확히 하기

답변의 서두에서 명확하게 동의 입장을 밝히고, 핵심 논리를 간단히 소개합니다.

"I would support the plan for a four-day workweek because it reduces burnout, improves work-life balance, and enhances productivity."

2. 논리적 근거 제시

1) 개인 시간 증가 및 번아웃 감소:

"A four-day workweek gives employees more personal time, which helps reduce burnout and improves mental health."

"With better mental well-being, employees can focus more effectively during work hours."

2) 워라밸 향상 및 업무 몰입도 증가:

"Having an extra day off encourages a better work-life balance, making employees more engaged and productive during the days they work."
"This balance allows employees to feel more satisfied and motivated."

3) 결근율 감소 및 생산성 유지:

"Well-rested employees are less likely to take sick days, reducing absenteeism and maintaining workplace efficiency."
"Companies can maintain high productivity by encouraging focused and efficient work during the shortened week."

4) 성공 사례 활용:

"For instance, companies in countries like Iceland that adopted a four-day workweek reported higher productivity and employee satisfaction."
"This example demonstrates the tangible benefits of such a policy."

3. 결론 정리

답변을 요약하며 입장을 재확인합니다.

"In conclusion, a four-day workweek promotes well-being, productivity, and job satisfaction, making it a highly beneficial policy for both employees and companies."

유용한 표현과 키워드

1. 핵심 주장 표현:

I strongly support the idea of a four-day workweek because...
A shorter workweek offers significant benefits such as...
This policy is highly effective in improving...

2. 워라밸 및 번아웃 관련 표현:

A four-day workweek reduces burnout and enhances mental health.
Employees with more personal time can better balance work and life.
Improved work-life balance leads to greater job satisfaction.

3. 생산성 및 동기 부여 강조 표현:

Employees who feel well-rested are more engaged and productive.
Focused work during a shortened week ensures high productivity.
Companies can achieve more with efficient and motivated employees.

4. 성공 사례 활용 표현:

For example, Iceland reported higher productivity after implementing a four-day workweek.
Research shows that shorter workweeks lead to better employee performance.
A good example of this strategy is seen in...

고득점을 위한 팁

논리적인 구성 유지:

답변을 2~3개의 주요 논점으로 나누고, 각 논점에 대한 구체적인 설명과 예시를 포함하세요.

구체적인 사례 활용:

답변에 성공적인 사례를 포함하면 답변의 설득력이 훨씬 높아집니다.

유용한 표현 연습:

실전에서 자연스럽게 활

원어민 모범답안 2.

I would not support the plan for a four-day workweek. Reducing the number of working days may lead to longer hours on the remaining days, which could increase stress. Some projects require a full five-day schedule for proper collaboration and communication, and squeezing work into fewer days could lower work quality. Moreover, customer service or industries with continuous operations may struggle to meet demands if employees are not available five days a week. In Korea, where the work culture emphasizes long hours, shortening the week might negatively impact productivity and customer service availability. A four-day workweek may disrupt operations and increase work pressure, making it less effective for certain industries.

답변 분석: 핵심 포인트와 구조

1. 핵심 주장:

4일 근무제는 일부 산업에서 비효율적이며, 업무 압박과 품질 저하를 초래할 수 있다.

2. 근거와 논리:

긴 근무 시간으로 인한 스트레스:

근무일이 줄어들면 남은 날의 근무 시간이 길어져 직원의 스트레스와 피로가 증가할 수 있다.

협업과 업무 품질 저하:

프로젝트나 팀 단위의 작업은 5일 근무 스케줄이 요구될 수 있으며, 업무를 압축하면 품질이 저하될 위험이 있다.

고객 서비스와 연속적 운영:

고객 서비스나 24시간 운영이 필요한 산업에서는 직원의 부재로 인해 서비스 제공에 어려움이 발생할 수 있다.

한국의 업무 문화:

장시간 근무를 중시하는 한국의 업무 문화에서는 4일 근무제가 생산성과 고객 서비스에 부정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있다.

고득점을 위한 답변 구성 가이드

1. 입장 명확히 하기

답변의 서두에서 비동의 입장을 명확히 밝히고, 간단히 근거를 제시합니다.

"I would not support the plan for a four-day workweek because it could lead to longer hours, reduced quality of work, and operational challenges in certain industries."

2. 논리적 근거 제시

1) 긴 근무 시간으로 인한 스트레스 증가:

"Reducing the number of working days may lead to longer hours on the remaining days, which could increase stress and fatigue among employees."
"This can negatively affect both productivity and employee well-being."

2) 협업과 업무 품질 저하:

"Certain projects require continuous collaboration, and compressing work into fewer days may lower the overall quality of output."
"This is especially true for industries where teamwork and daily updates are essential."

3) 고객 서비스와 연속적 운영의 문제:

"Industries like customer service or healthcare, which require consistent availability, would struggle to meet demands if employees are not available five days a week."
"This could result in customer dissatisfaction and reduced efficiency."

4) 한국의 업무 문화와 영향:

"In Korea, where long working hours are often emphasized, a four-day workweek might disrupt operations and reduce productivity."
"Shortening the workweek could also impact customer service availability, which is a priority for many businesses."

3. 결론 정리

답변을 요약하며 입장을 재확인합니다.

"In conclusion, while a four-day workweek might work for certain industries, it is impractical for others and could increase stress, disrupt operations, and negatively impact productivity in cultures like Korea’s."

유용한 표현과 키워드

1. 비동의 표현:

I respectfully disagree with the idea of...
In my opinion, a four-day workweek is not practical for...
While it may seem appealing, there are significant challenges such as...

2. 긴 근무 시간 관련 표현:

Longer working hours during fewer days could lead to increased stress and fatigue.
Employees might feel overburdened with intensified workloads.
This could negatively affect both productivity and employee well-being.

3. 산업별 적합성 강조 표현:

Some industries require continuous operations that cannot accommodate a four-day schedule.
Customer service and healthcare sectors need consistent employee availability.
Compressing work into fewer days may disrupt essential services.

4. 업무 문화 관련 표현:

In cultures like Korea’s, where long working hours are the norm, a shorter workweek might be counterproductive.
Shortening the workweek could impact customer service availability and operational efficiency.
This policy may not align with the work habits of certain regions or industries.

고득점을 위한 팁

구체적인 사례와 논리적 근거 활용:

한국의 업무 문화와 특정 산업의 현실적인 문제를 사례로 들어 답변의 설득력을 높이세요.

논리적으로 구성:

긴 근무 시간 → 협업 문제 → 고객 서비스의 연속성 부족 → 업무 문화라는 순서로 답변을 체계적으로 구성하세요.

유용한 표현 반복 연습:

실전에서 자연스럽게 답변할 수 있도록 위의 표현과 키워드를 자주 연습해 보세요.